On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:30:08PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: >On Thursday 17 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote: >>On Thursday 17 April 2008, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >>>There is a new shared library. Version 1:2.2.10-1 didn't ship a >>>shared library. >> >>Thanks for that. It's simple to see that the udeb is currently broken. >> >>$ dpkg -I pciutils-udeb_3.0.0-1_i386.udeb | grep ^Depends: >> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libpci3 >> ^^^^^^^ >>This means that the udeb currently depends on the regular library, which >>is not good. As no other packages need libpci, I think our preference is >>that the library is packaged in the same udeb as the executable, or that >>it is compiled in statically for the udeb. >> >>If the library is included inside the existing udeb, then please make >>sure that there is no unneeded dependency or self-dependency. >> >>If there are other udebs that could usefully use a separate libpci, then >>the situation would be different. >> >>Please do not upload to unstable until this is fixed and a new version >>has been tested. >> >>Cheers, >>FJP > >Hi Aníbal, > >I sent you this over a week ago, Aye. >but never received a reply. Sorry, I didn't think you were expecting a response. I'm planning to work on 3.0.0-2 with the programs in the udeb linked to the static library. >Did you get the mail? Yeah. >Think you can fix it yourself Yeah. >or could you use some help? Nah. >Cheers, >FJP Thank you! :) -- "Red Rosa now has vanished too" Bertolt Brecht
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature