Re: [directfb-dev] [g-i] Issues with directfb input devices handling
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 07:03:39PM +0200, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
> Sven Luther schrieb:
> >On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
> >>df_dok is 69K, but it also requires some images and loaders for PNG,
> >>JPEG, GIF, TTF.
> >
> >Well, the images and loaders are most probably already present on the
> >ramdisk
> >anyway. Those we care about at least ?
>
> The loaders probably, but not the images for the example program.
Does it need to be special examples, or would the graphical installer images
do ?
> >>So for simple graphics tests, as dfbinfo has no graphics, df_dok would
> >>be a huge "next step". You could use df_particle, which doesn't load any
> >>font or image, doesn't require additional DirectFB modules and is just
> >>5.7K here in binary size. Unfortunately, it uses a lot of floating point
> >>and sin/cos IIRC.
> >
> >So, at most we are speaking about a 100KB of binaries, and maybe 20KB if we
> >only go for df_particle ? Compared to a 10+ GB ramdisk, this is peanuts.
> >
> >Are df_particle and df_dok in the same tarball as the main directfb stuff ?
> >the debian libdirectfb-bin .deb package has only the dfb* binaries.
>
> df_dok and df_particle are part of DirectFB-examples.
ah, so probably not yet packaged.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: