Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:59:13 +0200 with message-id <200609281859.14348.elendil@planet.nl> and subject line Bug#388464: debian-installer: ~2.6.17-2 amd64 kernel appears to be missing lvm-mod has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: debian-installer: ~2.6.17-2 amd64 kernel appears to be missing lvm-mod
- From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:34:30 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20060920143430.3721.56996.reportbug@ailm.scealnetworks.com>
Package: debian-installer Version: Daily build 20060920 Severity: normal Installing a Dell 1950 Server (x86_64), LVM support is broken as there is no LVM support in the kernel (-8 or -9, I believe), and no LVM modules available. This worked with the i386 installer of the same build (20060920) - Alastair -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>, 388464-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#388464: debian-installer: ~2.6.17-2 amd64 kernel appears to be missing lvm-mod
- From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:59:13 +0200
- Message-id: <200609281859.14348.elendil@planet.nl>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4517A8D7.3020707@computer.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20060920143430.3721.56996.reportbug@ailm.scealnetworks.com> <[🔎] 200609221419.30831.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 4517A8D7.3020707@computer.org>
On Monday 25 September 2006 12:00, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Now, this morning I repeated this with the same CD and with the > weekly image amd64 binary-1.iso : the bug is no longer present on the > 20060918 > weekly image. Looks like that means this report can be closed... Cheers, FJP P.S. When are you planning to upload newt for #384787? Would be nice to have it in before D-I RC1...Attachment: pgpy7IBePlTBv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---