Re: [g-i] new screenshots available
On 6/23/06, Davide Viti <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:33:16AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Which version are you using?
we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory footprint
By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
> Previous shots of MuktiNarrow , ,  was fine. I think
> MuktiNarrow *should* be used. :)
we should probably file a whishlist bugreport asking for an udeb.
Would be nice have more choices.
I just took the same screenshots  using the newer libraries: does it look
any better (default fontsize is much bigger though)?
It's same. Conjunts are not rendering properly in . Normal texts
are okay and font size is better now.