Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:54:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200605160954.58735.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1147765056.5821.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 1147679595.7496.9.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 20060516070946.GF18668@powerlinux.fr> <[🔎] 1147765056.5821.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:37, you wrote:
> I disagree, they is a lot of changes and new features for 2.10 and "a
> random 2.9 snapshot" is not something we are wanting to ship with a
> stable Debian

Thank you for this quick and sane reply.

Attachment: pgpPtE7pQCq20.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: "Eddy Petrişor" <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>

References:
- graphics or text as default?
  - From: Stefano Canepa <sc@linux.it>
- gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
  - From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Next by Date: Re: powerpc daily sid_d-i CD builds working again
Previous by thread: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Next by thread: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread