[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#301162: marked as done (Package: installation-reports )



Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:23:53 -0500
with message-id <20050325012353.GC12149@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#301162: Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 04:53:57 +0000
>From michaelg@rbionline.com Wed Mar 23 20:53:57 2005
Return-path: <michaelg@rbionline.com>
Received: from (w01.stability.com.au) [203.63.254.132] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DEKM0-0003gc-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:53:56 -0800
Received: from Michael ([203.63.254.135])
	by w01.stability.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2O4rNG30801
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:53:23 +1100
From: "Michael Geddes" <michaelg@rbionline.com>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Package: installation-reports 
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:00:17 +1100
Message-ID: <006c01c5302e$5fadc620$9b0aa8c0@it.webease.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Importance: Normal
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: cdimage.debian.org sarge-i386-entinst.iso rc2
uname -a:
Date: 21 March 2005: 12:00  (+10:00)
Method: Net Install Image - from au.debian.org , booting off CDRom /
over NAT'd network

Machine: VIA chipset desktop 
Processor:Intel 500Mhz Celeron
Memory:
Root Device: IDE /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table: <Feel free to paste the full partition
      table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.>
Output of lspci and lspci -n:

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:

Suggestion: Should be able to set up a basic LVM partioned system by
just choosing a 'use LVM' vs 'use logical partitions'.  The same sort of
partition size/percentage etc are still just as valid for LVM as
logical.
Also, an option to choose main filesytem (ext3 vs ReiserFS vs VFS etc)
would be good.  These could both be on the same dialog!


//.ichael G.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301162-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 01:21:13 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Thu Mar 24 17:21:12 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DEdVg-000196-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:21:12 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dial-231.r04.scabvl.infoave.net [204.116.80.231])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BE417E2D
	for <301162-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:21:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3DF786E1AD; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:23:54 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:23:53 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 301162-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#301162: Package: installation-reports
Message-ID: <20050325012353.GC12149@kitenet.net>
References: <006c01c5302e$5fadc620$9b0aa8c0@it.webease.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <006c01c5302e$5fadc620$9b0aa8c0@it.webease.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 301162-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
	RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Michael Geddes wrote:
> Suggestion: Should be able to set up a basic LVM partioned system by
> just choosing a 'use LVM' vs 'use logical partitions'.  The same sort of
> partition size/percentage etc are still just as valid for LVM as
> logical.

There are already requests on file for this in the BTS, such as bug
#255189.

> Also, an option to choose main filesytem (ext3 vs ReiserFS vs VFS etc)
> would be good.  These could both be on the same dialog!

Select any partition and you are allowed to choose the type of partition
to put on it. No, we can't put multiple questions on one dialog.

--=20
see shy jo

--Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCQ2gpd8HHehbQuO8RAiY6AKCKAgAA/RlpblxIFskF/9+2d2Bp6QCdE+vV
2mrUnMUfhTCbFb8p3UEbFE4=
=8BO0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr--



Reply to: