Christian Perrier wrote: > The risk is indeed pretty minimal. As far as I remember, we only add > strings *added* in the trunk branch, but no string modified, ie no > string different in trunk than in sarge. > > Indeed, we could even put the PO files from packages/po in trunk to > the sarge branch with no harm (again, as far as I remember). > > Another solution (as I'm not *completely* sure at this moment and > cannot really check now) is for sure just disabling l10n-sync in > sarge. So, for security, I'll do this. I'm done with the merge. I did see some translatons that changed between trunk and sarge branch. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature