Alastair McKinstry wrote: > With exquisite timing, bug #297661 was filed as Release-Critical against > iso-codes. A fix is now pending in CVS, but not uploaded. > > The problem was incorrect entries in iso_639.tab; this file is not used > in iso_3166_udeb, in d-i; the file is marked deprecated as the XML > version is to be used instead; however it has gotten out-of-sync with > corrections and changes in the XML version; now fixed. > > The decision is whether or not to do an iso-codes upload. Its an arch: > all file, now problems with buildds delaying the build. My preference is > to downgrade the bug to Important: and upload post-sarge; if it breaks > other software (as claimed) then fix the other software to use the XML > version. This is noted in email to submitter and BTS. > > The decision is in Joeyh and the RM's hands. If it doesn't impact d-i then there's no reason to delay rc3 for it. I'm sure lots of other software related to d-i has rc bugs. :-) Do feel free to upload it after the udebs for 0.44-1 reach testing though. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature