[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 2.4.27-6 source and i386 images available for testing



Hi,

I have addressed the two problems that were raised on
debian-kernel, as noted below. The new packages
are available, look for the ones dated 29th November.

Goodies:
http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-source-2.4.27-2.4.27/
http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-2.4.27/

Changes:
http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-source-2.4.27-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_i386.changes
http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-2.4.27/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-6_i386.changes

-- 
Horms

On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:33:53AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Horms wrote:
> > If interested parties could take a look before I upload them I would
> > be grateful.
> 
> Build fails on alpha, patch attached.
> 
> Norbert

> --- tty_ioctl.c~	2004-11-26 09:01:12.000000000 +0100
> +++ tty_ioctl.c	2004-11-27 01:28:37.000000000 +0100
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@
>  	int retval;
>  	struct sgttyb tmp;
>  	struct termios termios;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	retval = tty_check_change(tty);
>  	if (retval)

Thanks, I have added that patch 

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:23:43AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
[snip]
> 
> I see the same build failure as reported for alpha on mips. The patch
> mentioned there seems to work.

Ditto


On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 11:10:35AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:08:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Horms wrote:
> > > If interested parties could take a look before I upload them I would
> > > be grateful.
> > 
> > Permissions of /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.4.27/apply/debian aren't
> > perfect:
> > 
> > -rwx--x--x  1 root root 4674 Nov 26 09:01 /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.4.27/apply/debian
> > 
> > Building kernel-images as user fails with "Permission denied".
> 
> The kernel source packages must be build with umask 022, someone should
> finaly fix this.

I have fixed my build script accordingly, though perhaps a better
fix would be fix debian/rules (and perhaps make-kpkg, I am not sure).



Reply to: