Bug#273024: marked as done (debian installer report)
Your message dated Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:40:36 +0200
with message-id <20040924114036.GA588@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#273024: debian installer report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2004 14:27:46 +0000
>From steve.etzell@selectcomfort.com Thu Sep 23 07:27:46 2004
Return-path: <steve.etzell@selectcomfort.com>
Received: from (postoffice04.comfort.com) [209.46.20.229]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CAUZW-0001Fs-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:27:46 -0700
Received: by postoffice.comfort.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
id <RGLXJC9A>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:27:15 -0500
Message-ID: <[🔎] F783830856DDAA46B65FF0D6F10B1690080BB5CA@postoffice.comfort.com>
From: "Etzell, Steve" <steve.etzell@selectcomfort.com>
To: "'submit@bugs.debian.org'" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: debian installer report
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:27:14 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: netinst RC1 cd image 23-Sept 2004 0800 CST
uname -a: Linux audit01 2.4.26-1-386 #1 Thu July 22 12:46:23 JST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 23-Sept 2004 0900 CST
Method: CD Image, local CD drive (/dev/hdc)
Machine: Dell Latitude C610 Laptop
Processor: 1GHz Pentium III
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: IDE, hda
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/had1 5341581 blocks / ext3
/dev/hda2 14193427 blocks W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5 3903763 blocks /home ext3
/dev/hda6 497983 blocks swap swa
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset Host Bridge (rev 04)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82830 830 Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 04)
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 42) 0000:00:1f.0
ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801CAM ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 02) 0000:00:1f.1 IDE
interface: Intel Corp. 82801CAM IDE U100 (rev 02) 0000:00:1f.5 Multimedia
audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 02)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility
M6 LY 0000:02:00.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M
[Tornado] (rev 78) 0000:02:01.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1420
0000:02:01.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1420
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:3575 (rev 04)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 8086:3576 (rev 04)
0000:00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 8086:2448 (rev 42)
0000:00:1f.0 0601: 8086:248c (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 0101: 8086:248a (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.5 0401: 8086:2485 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.6 0703: 8086:2486 (rev 02)
0000:01:00.0 0300: 1002:4c59
0000:02:00.0 0200: 10b7:9200 (rev 78)
0000:02:01.0 0607: 104c:ac51
0000:02:01.1 0607: 104c:ac51
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [)]
Comments/Problems:
Wow! This really worked great. I had installed two other systems recently
using the old method and this cut the install time in half, even though some
of the configuration utilities were new to me (partitioning the hard drive,
package selection using Aptitude).
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 273024-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2004 13:34:35 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Sep 24 06:34:34 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CAqDa-0001ZP-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:34:34 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dhcp-sn164-08.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.164.18])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3DD18DC3
for <273024-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:26:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4F5DF6E785; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:40:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:40:36 +0200
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 273024-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#273024: debian installer report
Message-ID: <20040924114036.GA588@kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] F783830856DDAA46B65FF0D6F10B1690080BB5CA@postoffice.comfort.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] F783830856DDAA46B65FF0D6F10B1690080BB5CA@postoffice.comfort.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Delivered-To: 273024-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Etzell, Steve wrote:
> Wow! This really worked great. I had installed two other systems recent=
ly
> using the old method and this cut the install time in half, even though s=
ome
> of the configuration utilities were new to me (partitioning the hard driv=
e,
> package selection using Aptitude). =20
Thanks for your report, since it was successful I'll close the bug
report.
--=20
see shy jo
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBVAezd8HHehbQuO8RAiY6AKDejrWl6APqz8tQDJH1+Ndyqx1qIwCfQpNt
1Stoh6Hvm+PSDW4AKMl4Jeo=
=Ry+K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--
Reply to: