[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255128: cdrom-detect: Bad handling of mount error

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:12:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Busybox does not have "sleep" on this version.  (Why?)
> Just to save space, though I understand it's in sid now.

Yes.  I though I saw sleep somewhere.  That was sid CD :-)

> > I will put updated patch, iso-image example, syslog-commented, etc at
> > 
> >   http://people.debian.org/~osamu/pub/d-i/
> > 
> > It works but I think following messages after Detecting CD needs to be
> > understood before applying.
> > 
> > | Jun 26 19:34:27 (none) user.notice cdrom-detect: Detected CD with 'testing' distribution
> > | Jun 26 19:34:27 (none) user.info main-menu[297]: (process:454): mount: Mounting /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 on /cdrom failed: Not a directory
> > | Jun 26 19:34:27 (none) user.info main-menu[297]: (process:454): umount:
> > | Jun 26 19:34:27 (none) user.info main-menu[297]: (process:454): /cdrom
> > | Jun 26 19:34:27 (none) user.info main-menu[297]: (process:454): : Invalid argument
> Hmm, I didn't think that main-menu did stderr interception and logging
> any more. It should just be redirected to the messages file these days.

This "Jun 26 19:34:27 (none) user.info main-menu[297]:
(process:454):..." types of delayed logging still happens on my new try
with sid (20040626) trial.  In both case, CD are correctly mounted
without issue.  Yes on this machine, sleep works but since without the
insertion of sleep works fine, I think I want to do without it.

Now that I verified with tc1 and 20040626-sid image.


PS: I noticed that business card CD does not support PCMCIA card
services.  3 floppies did better job for PCMCIA on my another i486
machine.  I do not have floppy on Dell so these modules could not be
made available (I did not bothered to burn another CD just for these
modules either).  Pity, Dell can not read CD-RW and this each trial is
making another silver disk.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: