Re: SVN: why 3691 instead of 3690?

To: "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@ui.edu>
Cc: Debian-Boot MILIS <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: SVN: why 3691 instead of 3690?
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 22:37:32 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040526013732.GB3144@kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@ui.edu>, Debian-Boot MILIS <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1085534921.1464.21.camel@rmsbase>
References: <[🔎] BAY16-F33iMCIqtQvAa00042db5@hotmail.com> <[🔎] pan.2004.05.25.14.14.27.821987@triplehelix.org> <[🔎] 1085534921.1464.21.camel@rmsbase>

Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
> 
> > svn co svn://svn.debian.org:3691/d-i/trunk debian-installer
> 
> May I know why 3691 instead of 3690?

This is not the only svn repository on the machine, and the others use
3690.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- d-i source is not accessible?
  - From: "Emby Sand" <embedded_@hotmail.com>
- Re: d-i source is not accessible?
  - From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
- SVN: why 3691 instead of 3690?
  - From: "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@ui.edu>

Prev by Date: Bug#250857: Fail to detect PCMCIA CD-ROM
Next by Date: Bug#250969: does not enable swap while running mkfs
Previous by thread: SVN: why 3691 instead of 3690?
Next by thread: Re: d-i source is not accessible?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread