SVN: why 3691 instead of 3690?

To: Debian-Boot MILIS <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Subject: SVN: why 3691 instead of 3690?
From: "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@ui.edu>
Date: 26 May 2004 08:28:41 +0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 1085534921.1464.21.camel@rmsbase>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] pan.2004.05.25.14.14.27.821987@triplehelix.org>
References: <[🔎] BAY16-F33iMCIqtQvAa00042db5@hotmail.com> <[🔎] pan.2004.05.25.14.14.27.821987@triplehelix.org>

> svn co svn://svn.debian.org:3691/d-i/trunk debian-installer

May I know why 3691 instead of 3690?

regards,

-- 
Rahmat M.  Samik-Ibrahim -- vLSM.org  -- http://rms46.vLSM.org/ --
Fetch my GNUPG public key at http://rms46.vlsm.org/pgp/pub.txt ---

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SVN: why 3691 instead of 3690?
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

References:
- d-i source is not accessible?
  - From: "Emby Sand" <embedded_@hotmail.com>
- Re: d-i source is not accessible?
  - From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#250843: install: /var/log/messages is not being tailed on console 3
Next by Date: boot logo revisited
Previous by thread: Re: d-i source is not accessible?
Next by thread: Re: SVN: why 3691 instead of 3690?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread