On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 05:11:58PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Am Mit, den 21.01.2004 schrieb Branden Robinson um 16:17:
I did not know whom to personally contact. So I decided to send this
mail to debian-packages@p.o and discover-workers@p.o in the hope that
the relevant people at progeny receive it.
discover-workers will suffice. :)
Would it bother you guys terribly to do this as a pre-approved NMU? We
can merge the changes back into our SVN repo.
I would be glad if this is merged back to your SVN repo. Is it possible
to arrange write access to it or do you want to merge the changes back
yourself?
I think our company policy is to manage such things ourselves.
The sources should always be available in the Debian archive, but we can
provide patches if you like.
Patches would be ideal. They're easy to merge. :)
Once LinuxWorld is off our plate, let's see if we can't keep pace with
your needs vis a vis Discover 2, and re-evaluate the maintainership
issue in 4 weeks or so.
Does that sound reasonable? Your plan sounds good to me, and like what
was already discussed, so it doesn't sound very disruptive to previous
expectations.
Yes this is OK and reasonable. I just wanted to make sure that this
upload is approved by progeny. I have put debian-boot@d.o in the
maintainer field of the udeb-only upload. Should this stay as it is atm
or should I put debian-packages@p.o there?
I suggest changing it to "discover-workers@lists.progeny.com".
And one last question: To make the package build on non-i386 archs I had
to copy the kernel pcmcia headers into the package source. I have done
this in a sperate directory for now, but the most clean solution seem to
me to have them in the same directory as the discover pcmcia stuff as
normal non-system headers. Would you accept a patch for that?
I'd like to get some other opinions on this. Eric, are you still
subscribed?