On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 01:16:29AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > I propose that we use what we have and do not try to force _new and > untested_ code to replace BFs. IMHO, either we base on boot-floppies and > freeze in few months, You can propose whatever you like, but the above is sadly deluded. From experience, getting b-f's updated and ported to the existing architectures takes between 8 and 12 months. We won't be freezing until we have a satisfactory and functioning installer. You're welcome to try to prove that this isn't the case, but everyone else has seen the way b-f's work a few times now, so don't expect anyone to believe your claims until you /have/ proved them. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Attachment:
pgp7rLtRF48b3.pgp
Description: PGP signature