Re: i18n second stage...
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 07:43:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Michael Bramer wrote:
> > A debian package maintainer don't need some reasons for a new package.
> > If the package is free and someone make the work, the ftp master(s)
> > should include the package on the debian ftp server.
> Not without good reason, and not if there is a consensus against or
> significant controversy around it. apt-i18n fails on at least 2 counts.
And not when it involves an essential package. mutt-ja is a different
matter to apt-i18n.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: