Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 12:07:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The same with gentoo, they have even managed to fit a 2.4 kernel on
> > their first and only CD.
> > But I have at least one Computer (i386, from end of 1996) where isolinux
> > fails.
> What kind of failure ? It doesn't boot at all ? It only manages to boot
> one image ?
I think the BIOS is just able to use el-toronto floppy emulation.
It says something about "1.4" before booting from harddisk.
> > MULTIBOOT seems to work everywhere at least with the first image, but it
> > fails on 2 newer systems.
> Fails in the meaning of booting the first image without proposing a menu
> or completely fails to boot ?
Sorry, I was not accurate.
It works without proposing a menu, but I will test today on another system and
"Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur,
nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." (Aurelius Augustinus)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com