On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:13:28AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: > > I just did a quick check -- disabling both dirname and basename will > save exactly 256 bytes on x86. Worth it? yes, we need every byte we can get. powerpc binaries are always larger then i386 anyway, and we are really hurting. > Here is something perhaps much more interesting: lazybox lists 'vi' > as nonexistant, yet the busybox .deb (which is what is used for the > boot-floppies) is enabling this applet. Disabling 'vi' will save > 24.3k on x86 (at the cost of losing the One True Editor ;) definitly kill vi i already did in my Config patch. there is absolutly no reason for two editors, either we kill vi, or we kill nano-tiny. that discussion has already occured, nano in vi out. > Thoughts? see above. > > but has anyone actually done any regression testing of posix shell > > scripts on it? > > just the regression tests that we have written ourself for busybox. > Do you have/know of any comprehensive posix shell test scripts? not really, you could test debootstrap, ybin and ofpath for a start... (ofpath requires a powerpc, ybin with proper configuration will run on anything and install bootstrap onto a floppy disk). -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgp6K7m_QeWS6.pgp
Description: PGP signature