trimming fat in busybox (was Re: Installer online help)
Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org> writes:
> Oh, thats right.
> I wonder if I should trim out some of the fat in the .deb then.
> For example, the .deb contains the busybox shell (lash), which
> is not being used... I expect a bit of hunting could find a
> fw others.
Fat trimming sounds worthwhile to me...
I'd hate to make the .deb less useful generally -- but I would love
the space savings...
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onshore.com.....<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: