Re: termwrap again
Thank you for your proposal.
In <[🔎] 20010523220633.A8437@kitenet.net>,
on "Wed, 23 May 2001 22:06:33 -0400",
with "Re: termwrap again",
Joey Hess <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> A package for such a small file seems like overkill. How about I put it
> in base-config and whoever we find who understands how it works (You, or
> if not you, I contemplate looking up the original author in the cvs
> logs..) can just maintain it from there. Everyone has commits to
> base-config cvs after all.
Hey, I've just uploaded the package for termwrap before reading this mail ;)
But I agree with you, base-config is perfect for us. I don't want to maintain
such a little single script only package.
I'll ask the removal of termwrap after the new base-config is installed.
(Or, if the new base-config comes very soon, it may be enough just
to remove it from Incoming of ftp-master.)
Taketoshi Sano: <email@example.com>,<firstname.lastname@example.org>,<email@example.com>