On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:51:24AM -0800, David Whedon wrote: > FYI, I'm hoping to have debian-installer complete (though perhaps not feature > full) for the woody release so it can get a round of testing before it is > endorsed as _the_ installer. We can have a note about it tucked away somewhere > with disclaimers of it being 'beta'. That will give us some good feed-back so > we'll have a stabel debian-installer for sid. Reasonable? FYI, (a) the next release won't be sid: sid is permanently unstable. The next release will be sarge, or something similar. (b) I'm hoping to have basically functional b-f's ready RSN [0], which we can then spend the next four months testing. I'm hoping by the time woody's released, we'll already be in a similar position with d-i, and that we'll be able to spend a good six to eight months testing it before sarge/woody+1 gets released. So I don't think we need to worry about having enough time to test d-i (since it should easily have 150% or 200% of the time b-f's will get), and I still think it'd be better to not divert people from testing b-f's in the meantime. (c) I'll be posting to -d-a in the next week or two about the plan for testing and freezing and releasing woody, unless a b-f's upload beats me to the punch. (d) debootstrap .debs (not .udebs yet) have made into into sid, fwiw. Cheers, aj [0] Relatively Soon Now -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgp0XHqdF5QLH.pgp
Description: PGP signature