Re: busybox for b-f yet?
Erik Andersen <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon Jan 29, 2001 at 02:57:44AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > I note that in busybox_0.49pre-1 we still don't yet have a means of
> > making the various symlinks to busybox stuff. Or am I just missing it?
> > Is this forthcoming? It's starting to be a bother not to have it...
> Hmm. Did I forget to enable 'busybox --install'? That is
> what you are supposed to be using.
No, I just didn't know about that (or forgot it). Thanks.
Will install symlinks relative to itself? Remember busybox is being
placed in a mounted loopback location at
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>