Re: busybox for b-f yet?
On Mon Jan 29, 2001 at 02:57:44AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> I note that in busybox_0.49pre-1 we still don't yet have a means of
> making the various symlinks to busybox stuff. Or am I just missing it?
> Is this forthcoming? It's starting to be a bother not to have it...
Hmm. Did I forget to enable 'busybox --install'? That is
what you are supposed to be using.
Erik B. Andersen email: firstname.lastname@example.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--