Bug#80325: Installer misreports partition numbers
Glenn McGrath <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > I would be more comfortable if you checked it against the kernel (or
> > fdisk, I guess) sources.
> Luck you did, from checking the linux code, i found that msdos style
> extended partition will always follow primary partitions, following this
> will be BSD or solaris on a first come first serve basis.
> The previous patch i did always put BSD before SOLARIS which is wrong
> This patch should be right i hope
Ok -- I think you should go ahead and apply this in CVS, ok?
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>