Re: Bug#81685: kernel doesn't have serial console
- To: Herbert Xu <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Bug#81685: kernel doesn't have serial console
- From: Adam Di Carlo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: 10 Jan 2001 22:35:42 -0500
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: Herbert Xu's message of "Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:28:46 +1100"
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20010110072919.A2284@gondor.apana.org.au> <email@example.com> <20010110185248.A12094@gondor.apana.org.au> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20010111072846.A22832@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 10:33:10AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
[Herbert and I talking about initrd]
> > I dunno.... my watchword is that if it involves major structural
> > changes to the boot-floppies, there's no point.
> There are two parts to initrd. One is the boot floppies, and the other
> is the kernel on an installed system. They're quite independent. So
> we can do initrd for one without doing it for the other. So I'd still
> like to see initrd for an installed system for woody even if it's too
> late for the boot floppies.
Hmm. If you have any suggested reading on initrd I'd love to see it
(URLS and such). I note there's an initrd HOWTO which I haven't read
Again, my priority is initrd insofar as it widens our base of
installable systems. I figured our targets would be the RaidTools
stuff and PCMCIA/floppy or PCMCIA/cd systems. Clearly that means the
initrd for boot-floppies, right?
Which initrd would be useful to you, as the kernel maintainer?
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>