Re: bad press at www.linuxworld.com
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 12:15:43AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 12:11:21AM +0200, Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > > > > > > - Identify themselves as the debian rescue floppy which is certianly
> > > > > > > confusing if you don't read documentation.
> > > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > >
> > > > > > Imagine my sympathy. This is someone passing himself off as a reviewer,
> > > > > > but he can't be bothered to read the docs?
> > > > >
> > > > > One thing not so clear is the location of rescue disks and the documents for
> > > > > a person new to debian.
> > > >
> > > > I agree with this. Location of rescue disks is really hard to guess.
> > >
> > > The potato CDs have the Installation Manual in a (more or less) intuitive
> > > locations:
> > >
> > > doc/install/index.html
> > > install/doc/index.html
> > >
> > > The top-level README.html file also links to the Manual in a straightforward
> > > manner.
> >
> > We're not talking about the manual but about rescue.bin, root.bin, etc ...
>
> The manual is supposed to tell you where those files are.
Just because the manual tells you were they are doesn't make it the best logical place. We're mixing up 2 different things.
>
> --
> Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
--
Eric.VanBuggenhaut@AdValvas.be
http://www.eric.ath.cx
Please don't send proprietary format documents, I can't (and don't want to) open them.
Appreciated are open-source formats like .txt or .rtf. Dvi, ps or tex files are welcome.
Reply to: