[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: m68k boot-floppies



On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 05:26:10PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > I have no idea where that images-* subdirectory comes from, or what it is
> > > used for, or whatever. What is release.sh trying to do at that stage? 
> > 
> > release.sh is responsible of putting everything built so far into a nice tree
> > under the release directory, which will later be put into
> > /debian/dists/potato/main/disks-m68k/date_of_built/
> 
> Thanks, I had a rough idea what release.sh does in general. What I'd like
> to know is what context that move or copy was in: move loose files into
> subdirectories as you described, or copy the machine specific file set
> into one directory to build the install-<machine>.lha from there? 

Err, only Christian can answer you here, altough i can have a look at the boot
floppies this evning, i wanted to do a apus build anyway.

only m68k has install-machine.lha stuff so i would guess the problem is from
there. Will try to build a install-apus.lha in the same way maybe i will come
upon the problem also then.

> > how comes you need the same file into various places, this don't seem very
> > efficient to me, and maybe is not needed ...
> 
> Way back in the old days when I built m68k boot-floppies (before there was
> a powerpc port to release), we decided to offer all required files for one
> machine type, minus the base archive, in one LHA archive, or StuffIt
> archive, or whatever might be the archiver of choice. The easiest way to
> do this is to copy all files into some release/<mach>/debian/ directory,
> archive that directory, then remove the whole thing again. The user
> downloads the appropriate archive plus basex_y.tar.gz, unpacks the archive
> and boots. We have a number of Mac users so we need to make it easy :-)

Err, ...

the archives are now in release/<subarch>/images-1.44 i think, they moved some
in the past, so maybe it is just the file name being bad in the installer
release part.

Friendly,

Sven LUTHER


Reply to: