[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Pure Blends on www.debian.org

Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> writes:
> One detail: That new page describes metapackage as a minimum requirement 
> for a blend - I disagree that to be a requirement¹, so am curious where 
> that came from.

In my reading this page does not describe a requirement, but a
status. And currently every released Pure Blend *has* metapackages,

Maybe, this paragraph could be rephrased as 

"The released Pure Blends have metapackages in the 
<a href="https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/>stable</a> release of
Debian. Some Pure Blends also provide installation media or form the
basis of a derivative distribution. See the individual Blends pages for
more information."

A naming question: are there any "non-pure" blends yet? I feel the
current convention a bit confusing: The Terminology in the Wiki means:

| "Blend" is a Debian-based distribution that is, or wants to become, a
| Pure Blend ... 

(not mentioning another meaning)
The new web pages has:

| Debian Pure Blends are also just called Blends when used clearly in
| the Debian internal context which makes "Pure" and "Debian" obvious,
| like on this page.

This is IMO hard to understand: how can I see what is a "Debian internal
context"? Is the Debian Wiki one? Or the Debian [Pure] Blends Pages? At
least, I was confused about that when I started to get interested in
[Debian] [Pure] Blends.

I would propose to either consequently stick to "[Debian] Pure Blends",
or to remove the non-pure definition from the Wiki and just to make the
first paragraph of www.d.o/blends as "Debian Pure Blends (or Blends, for
short) are a solution for special groups ...".

Best regards


Reply to: