Re: Debian Pure Blends on www.debian.org
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:26:28PM +0530, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Andreas Tille (2016-01-25 13:54:02)
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:56:46PM +0530, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> One detail: That new page describes metapackage as a minimum
> >> requirement for a blend - I disagree that to be a requirement¹, so am
> >> curious where that came from.
> >> - Jonas
> >> ¹ compare with https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends#Terminology
> > I would suggest to either add this to the Terminology or
> > s/minimum requirement/usual feature/
> Sorry, add what?
> Our definition at our wiki page does not mention metapackages, and I see
> no need for adding that requirement. In fact the two blends which I am
> most involved with do not include metapackages.
> If you suggest applying the sed script to www.debian.org, then perhaps I
> should simply step aside here to let the authors of that text discuss
> how to adjust it to better reflect our actual definition :-)
Either we decide here that metapackages are a minimum requirement and
add this to the definition (and I noticed that you are against this
change) or we change the detail you disagreed with in the way I
suggested. I did not put any preference on one of the two options I