Hi, On Mittwoch, 24. April 2013, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > All sets of metapackages for Blends targeting at Wheezy arrived in > > > testing: > > > debian-edu: 1.702 > Currently 1.702 *is* in testing and as far as I have understood release > team they do not like any further unblocks. drawing conclusions from something is sometimes difficult and might lead to wrong results: the fact there isnt an unblock request doesnt mean we think thats the most suitable version. (and I do know about unblock requests and other working tools and procedures of the release team.) > > But then, I also uploaded debian-edu 1.704 last night, which IMO would be > > far better suited for wheezy... (it needs a few other updates too). > So please make sure you will discuss this with release team *right now*. > We do have *ten* days until the announced release - so even if testing > would not be frozen the normal migration process from unstable to > testing would be really dense. the changes are not suitable according to their policy, so discussing is a bit, aeh, difficult. (been there, done that, though. ie for the squeeze release...) but, way more importantly: the changes are not enough yet, so it doesnt really matter wheather 1.702 or 1.704 are in wheezy, we really want the (currently non-existing 1.705 or 1.706), so why bother with 1.704. And thats why the above statement is somewhat wrong. (Which is fine, I do wrong statements all the time.) Glad that I understand the intention of your original mail. cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.