Re: PetSc
Hi Camm,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:23:53AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
>
> My understanding is that the most recent lam's mpirun can take the
> same syntax as mpich's, though it has additional options as well.
> Could be mistaken on this, as am not too familiar with mpich. Here is
> the latest synopsis:
That's another reason why I don't prefer mpich, all the command line
tools are braindead. Tried to run an adaptive quadrature routine
I'd written for a parallel programming course and with mpich I had
to change shell scripts in counter intuitive ways.
Thanks,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
Reply to:
- References:
- PetSc
- From: "Eray Ozkural \(exa\)" <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>