Re: PetSc
In Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:24:57 -0500 Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu> cum veritate scripsit :
Hello,
first point:
it is possible to build mpich's MPE library with LAM. ( I don't know how
debian lam would handle that tho'... need to include mpich source into
lam -- doesn't sound very good. Camm, is it done ?)
second point:
I think you can actually try playing around with update-alternatives.
You could build-depend on mpich and lam, and build two versions playing
around with update-alternatives. (theoretically)
Not that I've tried.
For performance of mpich and lam, I cannot comment on that.
regards,
junichi
--
University: ti0113@mail4.doshisha.ac.jp Netfort: dancer@netfort.gr.jp
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
... Long Live Free Software, LIBERTAS OMNI VINCIT.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PetSc
- From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>
- References:
- PetSc
- From: "Eray Ozkural \(exa\)" <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
- Re: PetSc
- From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>