[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PetSc

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:06:22AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

> Ah, yes. This is a nightmare, trying to compile against mpich AND lam.

The simplest solution is probably to have two different source packages
each with appropriate build depends.  It's ugly as hell but it would

Long term it would be nice if the various MPI implementations would be
binary compatible.  Then packages could be built for any of the various
implementations and would Just Work with others.  I'm not holding my
breath on that one, though.

Mark Brown  mailto:broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk   (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
EUFS        http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/

Attachment: pgpyVAJpKtBHQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: