[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Request to update dovecot to release v2.3.10.1



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 09:55 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> 在 2020-05-19星期二的 09:42 +0100,David Pottage写道:
> > I am not sure if this should be here or in the security list:
> > 
> > Over on the dovecot-news mailing list they have announced three 
> > vulnerabilities,
> > 
> >   - CVE-2020-10957
> >   - CVE-2020-10958
> >   - CVE-2020-10967
> > 
> > https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot-news/2020-May/000438.html
> > 
> > I am no expert, but it looks like in each case a remote attacker could 
> > cause a vulnerable server to crash by sending a malformed email.
> > 
> > Dovecot have released v2.3.10.1 to fix these issues, but that version 
> > has not appeared in Debian, and as far as I can tell the fixes to the 
> > above issues have not been backported to an older release.
> > 
> > Could we have an updated release please?
> 
> It is a pity that Debian's dovecot is having many open security issues and is
> not properly maintained. However, the criteria on making a backport is to
> properly fix those issues in Testing and Unstable/Sid first.
> 
> As you can see in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot , Debian's dovecot
> package maintainer did not make any update in the last 9 months. It would be
> better if you could help and push forward the package maintenance in
> Testing/Sid first before considering backports.
> 
> I'm also sending mail copies to dovecot package maintainers in hope that they
> would put their hands on the package again.

Dovecot maintains their own repos, you can always add their sources and
have the latest releases maintained by the dovecot pros.

https://repo.dovecot.org/

- -Jim P.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/Wl1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: