On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 23:34 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/22/2015 02:39 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 14:30 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > On 11/22/2015 12:12 PM, Micha Lenk wrote: > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > > > I am by no means a BPO FTP master, so please do not consider my answer > > > > authoritative by any means. > > > > > > > > This sounds like a huge amount of work, not only on your side but also > > > > on the side of backports FTP master. So may I ask you to provide more > > > > information about your motivation for using backports for this plan? > > > > > > The stable releases are what most users want to use OpenStack. Sid / > > > Testing is too disruptive for a production environment. The Icehouse > > > version in Stable is too old, and has lost support from upstream nearly > > > a year ago. > > [...] > > > > So why was it ever considered suitable for a stable release? > > > > Ben. > > I wrote "most" users, that's probably not all. Also, I am actively > working on backporting security fixes by myself. Swift for example, has > just been accepted to proposed-updates today. Glance will follow (I just > need to make sure that I understood well that Julien gave his go-ahead: > the package is ready). Next up is Nova. [...] Thanks, it's good to hear that you are maintaining stable as well. That was not the impression I got from your earlier message. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part