On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 13:02 +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote: [...] > We already have the technology to ensure that a suite is self-consistent and > this looks like precisely the sort of job that a computer will do better > than a human. Have we reached the stage where the backports archive is > sufficiently large and complex that it needs its own staging area with a > tool like britney or edos only permitting packages in that are actually > ready? (and the natural follow-up question is, how can this be done?) britney still needs hints from humans. So I would think this would need some volunteers to be RMs for backports. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings One of the nice things about standards is that there are so many of them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part