Hi, Thanks for the speedy reply. On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Jeroen Schot schrieb am Thursday, den 12. July 2012: > [...] > > I could not find anything about this on the backports website, but I can > > imagine the following extra rules for uploading to -sloppy: > > > > * Package must be in sid (or experimental?) > > sid and targetted to wheezy+1 > > > * Package must be at least 10 days old and without RC bugs. > > depends on the rc bug. We don't care for things like multi-arch or hardened > bugs. > > > * Package must be sufficiently different from the version in wheezy. > > This is a point for all backports :) A small clarification on the last point: for squeeze-backports the package should be sufficiently different from the version in squeeze (which I think you mean). My point is that the squeeze-backports-sloppy package should be sufficiently different from the 'normal' squeeze-backports package. Kind regards, Jeroen Schot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature