Quoting Cyril LAVIER (email@example.com): > Sadly for you, I'm not of one those people. Sadly for you, I tend to have confidence in Mike's judgement to decide what packages can deserve such treatment. > For Security updates, I completely understand this is a problem, but > when somebody performs a backport, he has to maintain the backport > and work with the maintainers. Mike is the maintainer of the package he intends to backport. At least, I guess so. > >PS: Please Cc me, I'm not subscribed. > > By the way, I CC'ed you, but you can subscribe to this mailing list, > you will have a better view on what exactly is the backport process. I'm not sure that Mike Hommey needs teaching about how to behave on mailing list and how backports are working.
Description: Digital signature