[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "Automatic" backports

Quoting Cyril LAVIER (cyril.lavier@davromaniak.eu):

> Sadly for you, I'm not of one those people.

Sadly for you, I tend to have confidence in Mike's judgement to decide
what packages can deserve such treatment.

> For Security updates, I completely understand this is a problem, but
> when somebody performs a backport, he has to maintain the backport
> and work with the maintainers.

Mike is the maintainer of the package he intends to backport. At
least, I guess so.

> >PS: Please Cc me, I'm not subscribed.
> By the way, I CC'ed you, but you can subscribe to this mailing list,
> you will have a better view on what exactly is the backport process.

I'm not sure that Mike Hommey needs teaching about how to behave on
mailing list and how backports are working.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: