[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nginx


On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:31:55PM +0100, daniel wrote:
> Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >  Technically you shouldn't go fix lintian issues. Most of them will also
> > appear in the package in unstable and should get fixed there - and for
> > those that appear specifically only for the backporting like the above
> > two you should follow the principle of only changing the parts that are
> > relevant for getting the backport working - i.e. minimal changes.
> Thanks for clarification, here is the full warning output:
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: the current version (0.7.64-1~bpo50+1) is
> smaller than the previous one (0.7.64-1)
> dpkg-genchanges: not including original source code in upload
> [...]
> W: nginx source: newer-standards-version 3.8.3 (current is 3.8.0)
> W: nginx source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
> W: nginx source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.7.64-1~bpo50+1
> W: nginx: unknown-section httpd

All of that is directly related to backporting the package and nothing
to worry about. So, yes, just ignore all of that.

> So, shall I ignore everything above? And if so, should I upload the
> package to some specific place for an eventual review? Or can I just
> upload it to my webserver and post a link here?

Uploading to some webserver is fine.


Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: