Hi, On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:31:55PM +0100, daniel wrote: > Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > Technically you shouldn't go fix lintian issues. Most of them will also > > appear in the package in unstable and should get fixed there - and for > > those that appear specifically only for the backporting like the above > > two you should follow the principle of only changing the parts that are > > relevant for getting the backport working - i.e. minimal changes. > > Thanks for clarification, here is the full warning output: > > dpkg-genchanges: warning: the current version (0.7.64-1~bpo50+1) is > smaller than the previous one (0.7.64-1) > dpkg-genchanges: not including original source code in upload > [...] > W: nginx source: newer-standards-version 3.8.3 (current is 3.8.0) > W: nginx source: changelog-should-mention-nmu > W: nginx source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.7.64-1~bpo50+1 > W: nginx: unknown-section httpd All of that is directly related to backporting the package and nothing to worry about. So, yes, just ignore all of that. > So, shall I ignore everything above? And if so, should I upload the > package to some specific place for an eventual review? Or can I just > upload it to my webserver and post a link here? Uploading to some webserver is fine. Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature