On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 06:30:19PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > > Are you using sa-update? If so, there's no reason to worry about what's > > in the package, since the updated rules it pulls in will already contain > > the fix. > > Reading this makes it sound as if a fix were always to have run > sa-update but that wasn't the case. The FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule wasn't > fixed in the sa-update rules until later in the day. For most of > January 1st the sa-update rules didn't have a fix. Right, I didn't mean to imply otherwise. If you installed a workaround previously, however, and are using sa-update, then you don't need to worry about updating your packages at this time and can safely re-enable the FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule. noah
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature