Re: mercurial backport failed to build - quilt backport required?

[Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>]

Vincent Danjean schrieb am Tuesday, den 18. August 2009:

> Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Vincent Danjean schrieb am Tuesday, den 18. August 2009:
> >> So, I will reupload mercurial and depend on (quilt >> 0.46-6) instead of
> >> (quilt >= 0.46-7).
> > No. Depend on the specific backport version. 
> 
> Sorry, too late.
> 
> I change the dependency in the 'main' repo (ie the svn repo of the unstable
> packaging). This change will also be in unstable in the next upload (but unless
> you require it, I do not plan to upload mercurial to unstable with just this
> change). I want to minimize the changes between backports and unstable.
> 
>   Do you think that (>= X-Y) should be written (>= X-Y~~) so that it works
> both for unstable, backport and correctly manage security updates (I just
> realized now that if a security quilt package 0.46-6+... is uploaded, my
> dependency will not work)
> 
>   Do you want I reupload with (quilt >= 0.46-7~~) ?
Shouldn't be neccessary for this upload.

Alex