Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3.5
Can all please take their happy pills again and calm down a bit?
* Cyril Brulebois <email@example.com> [2009-07-08 17:13:50 CEST]:
> Still, Mike posted various progress reports (see e.g. ). That's not
> what I called “it is not packaged”.
> 1. http://glandium.org/blog/?p=376
Well, progress reports _is_ "not packaged" to some degree. To most
people "packaged" means available as a package, and many of them expect
them to be in the regular pool too - especially since the context here
is the backports.org service which has it in its rules that there has to
be a package for it in squeeze.
Can we get back to a decent round of "it is" "it isn't" "is too" again? :)