Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3.5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark Florian schrieb:
> Are the any policy reasons why Firefox/Iceweasel 3.5 wouldn't be
> accepted into lenny-backports? Assuming, of course, the package
> conforms to the standard, and was taken from testing (though it's not
> even in unstable yet).
Check it out yourself, atm it is not packaged and so on no one realy
knows it, just wait.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
patrick@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkpTfHQACgkQ2XA5inpabMe4ogCgkl/FtCjhixJlUQ+hED6irABR
Nc4AoKL1r88cF/pqC40aQ7Sm0+J3mu5X
=HvU4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: