Re: Version strings for backports

[Vlada Macek <tuttle@sandbox.cz>]

Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>   
>> Maybe ~bpo31-N / ~bpo40-N ?
>>     
> i like ~bpo.$suite.$int better, e.g. ~bpo.sarge.1 or ~bpo.etch.1
>   

If I may contribute, I think more people are familiar with the names
(sarge, etch, ...) than the versions (3.1, 4.0, ...). Also the names are
clear, whereas looking at the package file, numbers add another mystery
for many.

justmy2cents

-- 
\//\/\


begin:vcard
fn:Vlada Macek
n:Macek;Vlada
adr:;;;Liberec;;;Czech Republic
email;internet:tuttle@sandbox.cz
title:UNIX Admin && Developer
tel;cell:+420 608 978 164
note;quoted-printable:GPG info: key 0x1F059424, fingerprint 1494 F8DD 6379 4CD7 E7E3 1FC9 D750=
	 4243 1F05 9424=0D=0A=
	=0D=0A=
	When you find a virus in mail from me, then I intended to infect you, sin=
	ce I use SW that is not distributing malware w/o my knowledge.=0D=0A=
	=0D=0A=
	
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard