Re: bits from the OpenOffice.org backporter

To: backports-users@lists.backports.org
Subject: Re: bits from the OpenOffice.org backporter
From: Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:19:46 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060703091946.GB25597@rollcage.inittab.de>
Mail-followup-to: backports-users@lists.backports.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200607031059.58498.rizsanyi@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <20060630114154.GB3318@rene-engelhard.de> <[🔎] 44A84AB4.6000003@itmaze.com.au> <[🔎] 20060703083816.GI13600@rollcage.inittab.de> <[🔎] 200607031059.58498.rizsanyi@users.sourceforge.net>

* Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote:
[...]
> And one other solution would be to backport the latest freetype.

Erm, no. This is a bug in the freetype security update, and should be
fixed there.

                Norbert

Reply to:

References:
- Re: bits from the OpenOffice.org backporter
  - From: Onno Benschop <backports@itmaze.com.au>
- Re: bits from the OpenOffice.org backporter
  - From: Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de>
- Re: bits from the OpenOffice.org backporter
  - From: Zsolt Rizsanyi <rizsanyi@users.sourceforge.net>

Prev by Date: Re: bits from the OpenOffice.org backporter
Next by Date: mysql 5 packages problem with /etc/cron.daily/mysql-server
Previous by thread: Re: bits from the OpenOffice.org backporter
Next by thread: Re: bits from the OpenOffice.org backporter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread