[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Evince backport proposal (2)

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 03:38:28PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > Removing it, even if I could, would not be a good idea IMHO.
> verified.
> > That's why I think we should enforce using dh_helper4 in this
> > particular case, even if v5/bop is currently
> > installed.
> ok. set it to (<< 5)

Done, hopefully this is good now.

> > Meanwhile, djvulibre's maintainer told me the package compiles
> > perfectly with debhelper4, so I'll do that instead.
> no, leave that unchanged. otherwise, it's cumbersome to update the
> backport an *always* test and verify, if it really still builds with dh4.
> although i'm going to upload it when you changed mentioned things above,
> it will maybe superseeded in summer with my potential gnome backport.

Ok, no problem.

I'm still interested in the backports sbuild configuration, if anybody
knows about it :)


Reply to: