Re: latency test results for armhf vs arm64?
On 7/16/22 11:32, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 08:41:07AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
I wish you would admit that the raspios I am running IS armhf (kernel7l)
I've no clue where you got the impression it was v6. It is not.
You said raspios which sure looks like raspian. Raspian/Raspberry Pi
OS is armv6. If you are running Debian armhf, then it is armv7 but it
would be a lot less confusing to call it Debian and not raspios in
that case.
raspian/raspios is available in all 3 flavors.
Doesn't matter what your kernel is. What is your userspace you are
actually running?
The card its running on right now is over 2 years old, zero problems,
and has had all updates, including a daily update of linuxcnc from the
the buildbot, or if the buildbot is down, my own scripts also building
installable deb's. The secret is use a big enough card that it has enough
room to do its maintenance. 64G card has around 15G's on it.
Backups once in a while of the card is still nice to have.
True, but when those two seagate 2T drives puked in quick succession, I
lost all
my patched amanda sources. I'd only been running amanda since 1998.
I figured if bullseye ever stabilizes I might see about starting it up
again. But UM
sold it to zmanda so progress stopped, and then was sold to Betsol about 2
years back, and so far they've been all hat and no cattle. As far as I'm
concerned its time to look for a new backup strategy that mimics how amanda
worked. IOW I'm still building this box, almost from scratch. Its been
very painful
so far with bullseye.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/>
Reply to: