Re: Re: Re: [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> UEFI is explicitly specified to give standard interfaces with
> reliable, known behaviour across different implementations. It's often
> *not* easily user-replaceable (just like on x86 servers) and we should
> not be buggering with it once it works.
We'll agree to disagree then. I think keeping vendor supplied stuff of
any kind is suboptimal at best. I want coreboot/grub/u-boot/Linux/etc
not Phoenix BIOS/proprietary versions of TianoCore/etc.