On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 02:34:35PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Riku Voipio wrote: > > As mentioned elsewhere on the thread, the biggest deal is getting > > openmoko supprted. But I believe it's more of a kernel and d-i team > > issue than ARM port issue. > > Eh, support for new hardware is not implemented by the D-I team, but by > porters. Of course, we welcome porters to be active in the D-I team, but > don't expect support for new hardware to magically appear. > > (But I think you already know that and it was just a case of unfortunate > wording.) Yeah, and that's what's actually happening. Luca and I are currently working on the Openmoko stuff, but we of course welcome others to help. BTW I would consider myself more as a d-i team member than an arm porter..., but I don't think this really matters. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature