R: performance information
Yes, SS4000E , based on EM-7210 card.
I got the kernel sources from www.kernel.org
I took version 184.108.40.206
then I patched it applying all the patches present in
I DON'T applied the commented out patches:
this is the series file:
so actually I didn't apply "dma_test.patch"
Do you think try to recompile zImage after applying this patch could bring to better performance ?
My second question was about disks status led: It could be fine to see the lighted when they
are working. With the original software they lights on traffic, so I think that they are not
Da: Arnaud Patard [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Inviato: martedì 18 novembre 2008 16.39
A: Andrea Lanza
Oggetto: Re: performance information
Andrea Lanza <email@example.com> writes:
> hi al,
> I am completly new to this list and to Debian and arm too.
> Anyway I succeded in installing my Intel S4000e with kernel 220.127.116.11 and latest lenny Debian.
You meant SS4000e, right ? :)
> I cross compiled my kernel using the patch I found on the net and then moved the zImage
> to the scratched (init-ialized) RedBoot Flash.
> I really have to thanks this site http://em7210.kwaak.net/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/wiki because
> without it I could never accomplish to this task
> Everything seems fine, I also installed nfs and samba joined to my domain.
> The question is: I scratched my SS400E because it was really slow, using samba AND nfs
> was almost impossible (no more than 1MB/s write speed)
> Now the performance are considerably better than before, but I think they are still poor.
which kernel sources are you using ? There are some experimental patches
for dma offload which should help getting things better (look to the
archives in this mailing-list. There should also be a bug open for the